🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a solid starting point," said the MEP driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," said a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level due to federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of the West, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that states around the world are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.